Loading report..

Toolbox

MultiQC Toolbox

Highlight Samples
    Rename Samples

    Paste two columns of a tab-delimited table here (eg. from Excel). First column should be the old name, second column the new name.

      Show / Hide Samples
        Explain with AI

        Configure AI settings to get explanations of plots and data in this report.

        Keys entered here will be stored in your browser's local storage. See the docs.
        Switch out sample names with random identifiers
        Export Plots
        px
        px
        X
        Note: Additional data was saved in multiqc_data when this report was generated.
        Choose Plots

        If you use plots from MultiQC in a publication or presentation, please cite:

        MultiQC: Summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report
        Philip Ewels, Måns Magnusson, Sverker Lundin and Max Käller
        Bioinformatics (2016)
        doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354
        PMID: 27312411
        Save Settings
        Report settings are automatically saved in your browser as you use the toolbox. You can also save named configurations below.
        Load Settings

        Choose a saved report profile from the browser or load from a file:

        Tool Citations

        Please remember to cite all of the tools that you use in your analysis.

        About MultiQC

        This report was generated using MultiQC, version 1.35

        MultiQC is published in Bioinformatics:

        MultiQC: Summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report
        Philip Ewels, Måns Magnusson, Sverker Lundin and Max Käller
        Bioinformatics (2016)
        doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354
        PMID: 27312411

        MultiQC is developed by Seqera.

        Scroll to top

        BAM_QC_example

        A modular tool to aggregate results from bioinformatics analyses across many samples into a single report.

        Report generated on 2026-06-13, 14:36 UTC based on data in: example-out/03_results

        General Statistics

        Showing 4/4 rows and 10/28 columns.
        Sample Name≥ 1X≥ 5X≥ 10X≥ 30X≥ 50XMedianMean Cov.Min Cov.Max Cov.Mb Total Coverage BasesGenome lengthError rateNon-primaryReads mapped% Mapped% Proper pairs% MapQ 0 readsTotal seqsMean insertReadsReads mapped% Reads mappedReadsBasesCoverageMean depthMean BQMean MQ
        tiny
        0.00%
        0.0M
        0.0M
        100.0%
        0.0%
        0.0%
        0.0M
        0.0bp
        0.0M
        0.0M
        100.0%
        tiny.coverage
        0.0M
        0.0Mb
        20.0%
        0.2x
        40.0
        60.0
        tiny.genome
        20.0%
        0.0%
        0.0%
        0.0%
        0.0%
        0X
        0.2X
        0.0X
        1.0X
        0.0Mb
        200
        tiny.regions
        51.0%
        0.0%
        0.0%
        0.0%
        0.0%
        1X
        0.5X
        0.0X
        1.0X
        0.0Mb
        79

        Mosdepth

        Fast BAM/CRAM depth calculation for WGS, exome, or targeted sequencing.https://github.com/brentp/mosdepthDOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx699

        Cumulative coverage distribution

        Proportion of bases in the reference genome with, at least, a given depth of coverage. Note that for 2 samples, a BED file was provided, so the data was calculated across those regions. For 1 samples, it's calculated across the entire genome length. 1 samples have both global and region reports, and we are showing the data for regions

        For a set of DNA or RNA reads mapped to a reference sequence, such as a genome or transcriptome, the depth of coverage at a given base position is the number of high-quality reads that map to the reference at that position, while the breadth of coverage is the fraction of the reference sequence to which reads have been mapped with at least a given depth of coverage (Sims et al. 2014).

        Defining coverage breadth in terms of coverage depth is useful, because sequencing experiments typically require a specific minimum depth of coverage over the region of interest (Sims et al. 2014), so the extent of the reference sequence that is amenable to analysis is constrained to lie within regions that have sufficient depth. With inadequate sequencing breadth, it can be difficult to distinguish the absence of a biological feature (such as a gene) from a lack of data (Green 2007).

        For increasing coverage depths (1×, 2×, …, N×), coverage breadth is calculated as the percentage of the reference sequence that is covered by at least that number of reads, then plots coverage breadth (y-axis) against coverage depth (x-axis). This plot shows the relationship between sequencing depth and breadth for each read dataset, which can be used to gauge, for example, the likely effect of a minimum depth filter on the fraction of a genome available for analysis.

        Created with MultiQC

        Average coverage per contig

        Average coverage per contig or chromosome

        Created with MultiQC

        Samtools

        Version: 1.23.1

        Toolkit for interacting with BAM/CRAM files.http://www.htslib.orgDOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352

        Percent mapped

        Alignment metrics from samtools stats; mapped vs. unmapped reads vs. reads mapped with MQ0.

        For a set of samples that have come from the same multiplexed library, similar numbers of reads for each sample are expected. Large differences in numbers might indicate issues during the library preparation process. Whilst large differences in read numbers may be controlled for in downstream processings (e.g. read count normalisation), you may wish to consider whether the read depths achieved have fallen below recommended levels depending on the applications.

        Low alignment rates could indicate contamination of samples (e.g. adapter sequences), low sequencing quality or other artefacts. These can be further investigated in the sequence level QC (e.g. from FastQC).

        Reads mapped with MQ0 often indicate that the reads are ambiguously mapped to multiple locations in the reference sequence. This can be due to repetitive regions in the genome, the presence of alternative contigs in the reference, or due to reads that are too short to be uniquely mapped. These reads are often filtered out in downstream analyses.

        Created with MultiQC

        Alignment stats

        This module parses the output from samtools stats. All numbers in millions.

        Created with MultiQC

        Flagstat

        This module parses the output from samtools flagstat

        Created with MultiQC

        Flagstat: Percentage of total

        This module parses the output from samtools flagstat

        Created with MultiQC

        Mapped reads per contig

        The samtools idxstats tool counts the number of mapped reads per chromosome / contig. Chromosomes with < 0.1% of the total aligned reads are omitted from this plot.

        Created with MultiQC

        Coverage: global stats

        Stats parsed from samtools coverage output, and summarized (added up or weighted-averaged) across all regions.

        Showing 1/1 rows and 6/6 columns.
        Sample NameReadsBasesCoverageMean depthMean BQMean MQ
        tiny.coverage
        0.0M
        0.0Mb
        20.0%
        0.2x
        40.0
        60.0

        Coverage: stats per region

        Per-region stats parsed from samtools coverage output.

        Created with MultiQC

        Software Versions

        Software Versions lists versions of software tools extracted from file contents.

        SoftwareVersion
        Samtools1.23.1